<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lee's Divorce &#038; Family Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://divorceinfo.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;Profiting From Divorce&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=873</link>
		<comments>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=873#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Borden</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an interesting article in the NY Times this morning about the apparently shameful business of investing in people&#8217;s divorces. Hard for me to get too worked up about it.



The story, which you cannot read without registering (but it&#8217;s free), is entitled &#8220;Taking Sides in a Divorce, Chasing Profit.&#8221; It&#8217;s about companies that are setting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=873</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Breathtaking Expansion of Juvenile Court Jurisdiction</title>
		<link>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=854</link>
		<comments>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=854#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Borden</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did the Alabama Supreme Court know what it was doing when it issued this ruling? It really doesn&#8217;t matter now. With apologies to the late Roy Scheider, we&#8217;re gonna need a bigger court.



The case, Ex parte L.E.O., Case No. 1090565 (Ala. September 17, 2010), starts simply enough. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s so scary about it. Parents divorced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=854</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Balancing Judgeships in Alabama</title>
		<link>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=765</link>
		<comments>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=765#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Borden</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of her &#8220;Access to Justice&#8221; initiative, Alabama Supreme Court  Chief Justice Sue Bell Cobb is preparing to seek a reallocation of  judgeships among Alabama counties. She knows she&#8217;s walking into a buzz saw, so she  is intentionally tiptoeing in slowly, and she wants lots of company. She wants to  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=765</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is Supporting Family Values?</title>
		<link>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=837</link>
		<comments>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=837#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Borden</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one has me thinking. I hope it gets you thinking, too. If we really want families in America to succeed, what policies should we be setting?


There&#8217;s an op-ed piece in the Christian Science Monitor from two law professors who have examined the difference between practices and results in families from &#8220;red&#8221; (conservative) states and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=837</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alabama Relocation: The Law Means What It Says</title>
		<link>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=828</link>
		<comments>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=828#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Borden</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alabama&#8217;s relocation act has moved the state to one end of the spectrum on forcing parents to stay close to each other. The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals has said you can&#8217;t go beyond it out of a desire to elevate substance over form.


The case is T.C. v. C.E., Case No. 2080763 (Ala. Civ. App. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=828</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Awarding Military Retirement Benefits in Divorce in Alabama</title>
		<link>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=811</link>
		<comments>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=811#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Borden</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals has used an unusual inference to sustain a division of military retirement plans in an Alabama divorce.


The case is Powe v. Powe, Case No. 2080557 (Ala. Civ. App. November 20, 2009). The parties divorced after a 23-year marriage, and the trial court awarded the wife $500 per month from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=811</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can I Sue the &#8220;Other Woman&#8221; or &#8220;Other Man&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=816</link>
		<comments>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=816#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Borden</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN published its contribution last month to the continuing mythology surrounding the tort called &#8220;alienation of affection,&#8221; filing a lawsuit against that interloper who seduced your spouse and ruined your marriage. 


Coverage like this is typical of journalism in America today, full as it is of breathless and sensational warnings of events that are extremely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=816</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Part of &#8220;You&#8217;re Wrong&#8221; Don&#8217;t You Understand?</title>
		<link>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=804</link>
		<comments>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=804#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Borden</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s rare to see a trial court try to overcome an appeals court ruling by sheer bull-headedness, but it&#8217;s fun to see in a guilty pleasure kind of way, don&#8217;t you think?


This is a step-parent adoption case. It&#8217;s not new to the appeals court. The first time was last year, M.M. v. D.P., 10 So. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=804</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Mom Lives in Two Places</title>
		<link>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=799</link>
		<comments>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=799#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Borden</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We now can state with certainty: a substantial change in residence of a custodial parent is a material change in circumstances.


The case is Marsh v. Smith, Case No. 2080479 (Ala. Civ. App. October 30, 2009). Mom and Dad divorced and agreed to equal time parenting for their daughter, one week with Dad, one week with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=799</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anybody Got Any Facts To Back This Up?</title>
		<link>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=796</link>
		<comments>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=796#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Borden</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?p=796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alabama family law judges know they have to base their rulings on some kind of factual evidence. This case clarifies how the process works.


We&#8217;re talking about Rose v. Jackson, Case No. 2071057 (Ala. Civ. App. October 16, 2009). Mom and Dad divorced in 2007. Mom got custody of the child, Dad visitation and the duty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://divorceinfo.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=796</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

